When things just don't seem to work
We ran the CDISC Define-XML-2-0_ReleasePackage20140424\adam\define2-0-0-example-adam.xml through the OpenCDISC Community Validator (standard = define.xml , Configuration = Define 2.0.xml ) and incurred 2 errors which should not be errors. I have attached the OpenCDISC output.
Dear all,
I validated the SDTM domains of a study with OpenCDISC Community Validation and I found out some errors an warnings that in my opinion could be mistakes.
In details:
Hi,
I am getting a Warning about ECSTDTC and ECENDTC being in the wrong order within the EC domain, however the dataset appears OK to me.
The config-sdtm-3.2.xml file looks like there may be some issues in the OrderNumber values for the EC domain, and assuming these values are used to check variable order, this could be the problem?
Thanks,
Brian
Hi,
There is a bug in the configuration file: I get a message stating: "Value for QSTEST not found in (CDR TEST) CT codelist", looking at config file i found number Codelist Code number are switch between QSTEST & QSTESTCD.
Hi,
We noticed many false positives with CT0181 and CT0182, and upon further investigation it looks like the configuration file has the CT Codelist Codes switched (C101817 where C101818 should be, and vice versa). We saw this with the 3.1.3 configuration.
Thanks,
Brian
Hi ,
I am trying to validate the input file through java program. I have define.xml in one location.
I tried to open the define.xml file through java , i get schematron error. the file is present in location.
I tried to validate the file in standalone opebdisc clinet , it is generating the error report.
I am new to OPendisc and SAS please let me know any hints. I am stuck on this from 2 days.
In my TS domain, OpenCDISC 1.5 with SDTM IG 3.1.3 and the CDISC CT version 2014-03-28, I'm getting CT0081 and CT0081R errors on the TSPARMCD="SPONSOR" and TSPARM="Clinical Study Sponsor" record.
The message is that the two values do not have the same code in the CDISC CT, but in fact both of them have the code C70793.
Any idea what might be going wrong with this test?