When things just don't seem to work
Hi,
When validating a define.xml, false positives have appeared:
DEFINE DD0031: 1 Error - Missing NCI Code for Codelist 'Null Flavors'
count: 1 | | Missing NCI Code for Codelist 'Null Flavors' (Error)
DEFINE DD0032: 2 Errors - Missing NCI Code for Term in Codelist 'Null Flavors'
count: 1 | CodedValue = NA | Missing NCI Code for Term in Codelist 'Null Flavors' (Error)
count: 1 | CodedValue = PINF | Missing NCI Code for Term in Codelist 'Null Flavors' (Error)
The CT2004 ERROR message (TSVALCD value not found in 'No Yes Response' non-extensible codelist when TSPARMCD == 'RANDOM') is displayed when I use new Pinnacle 21 v 2.1.1 release, however it seems that my TS domain data is not wrong (regardless of C49488=Y or C49487=N). This issue is found in othe companies. Could you please check it?
we encountered the below issue when we tried to modify the CT text file for version 1.5 of opencdisc in windows but the same file when we use in our linux servers we have no issues in validating our custom CT. we even checked for special characters and all seem to match. yet we get the below issues.
we encountered the below issue when we tried to modify the CT text file for version 1.5 of opencdisc in windows but the same file when we use in our linux servers we have no issues in validating our custom CT. we even checked for special characters and all seem to match. yet we get the below issues.
Hi Gerard, thank you for answering my previous question.
Here is my another question:
You have follwoing check in config_sdtm_1.5.xml for EQ-5D-5L testcds
December 2015 CT release does not have separate QS-FT file for both 1.5 and 2.01 versions. Could you please let us knw the reason behind this?
Some of the rules for QSTESTCD and QSTEST are not in configuration file for ACQ category. Could you please let us knw the reason behind this?
Regards,
Megha
Hi, I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction.
I have the following command string when running OCV using CLI on ADaM xpt files:
CDISC Validator 2.0.2 for CT- 2015-09-25 is not querying any errors or warning if a unit /other CT variable of an extensible codelist has been used. Is there any particular reason why this rule is not working for this CT alone for the version 2.0.2?
Plese let me report an issue that Pinnacle 21(ver 2.1) crashed while validation of define.xml(ver.1.0). The issue happened not in ver.2.0 but only in ver.2.1.
I tried several times changing structure of define.xml and finally found this issue was caused by 'SASDatasetName' attribute in ItemGroupDef tag. Once I removed the attribute, validation finished without crash.
Could you investigate and fix this issue? Thank you.
I generated a define.xml 2.0 file using the new Pinnacle 21 define generator that passed validation however there appears to be an issue with the WHERE clause in the Value Metadata. It seems to repeat some of the criteria variables so it would show something like this in the WHERE column:
EGTESTCD='HR' and
EGCAT='MEASUREMENT' and
EGTESTCD='HR' and
EGCAT='MEASUREMENT'.