Forums: Validation Rule Suggestions
Hi!
Yes, I agree that expected Trial Summary parameters in the study data should be populated and the OpenCDISC validator needs to enforce those it.
Thank you,
Sergiy Sirichenko
OpenCDISC
Hi, Sergiy,
Thansk for the fast reply.
Some additional questions:
Let's say that for the same study we use 2 different routes (e.g. "Dermal" and "Gavage"). How to represent this into TS.xpt? 2 lines for TSPARMCD=ROUTE: first with TSPARM="Dermal" and TSSEQ=1, the next with TSPARM="Gavage" and TSSEQ=2?
Also, if we administer 2 different compounds, each with a different vehicle (C1 with V1 and C2 with V2), they should be linked via TSGRPID like below?
TSPARMCD="TRT", TSPARM="C1", TSGRPID=g1, TSSEQ=1
TSPARMCD="TRT", TSPARM="C2", TSGRPID=g2, TSSEQ=2
TSPARMCD="TRTV", TSPARM="V1", TSGRPID=g1, TSSEQ=1
TSPARMCD="TRTV", TSPARM="V2", TSGRPID=g2, TSSEQ=2
Note: validations for TSSEQ and TSGRPID should also be done in TS by the Validator.
Hi Amelia,
It should be one-to-one relationship between values of --PARM and --PARMCD variables. Therefore your TS may be something like this:
TS domain example data with selected columns | |||||||
TSSEQ | TSGRPID | TSPARMCD | TSPARM | TSVAL | |||
1 | Treatment1 | TRT | Investigational Therapy or Treatment | Compound 1 | |||
2 | Treatment2 | TRT | Investigational Therapy or Treatment | Compound 2 | |||
1 | ROUTE | Route of Administration | Dermal | ||||
2 | ROUTE | Route of Administration | Gavage | ||||
1 | Treatment1 | TRTV | Treatment Vehicle | V1 | |||
2 | Treatment2 | TRTV | Treatment Vehicle | V2 |
Regards,
Sergiy
Hi all,
Another scenario similar to the previous one, but with just one compound and two vehicles - both vehicles are used for the same compound.
How can you relate the vehicles to the compound via TSGRPID? I assume you can't add the same compound (TRT) twice, each time with a new TSGRPID for vehicle1 and vehicle2. And you can't have 2 entries in TSGRPID for TRT...
Should I just just add 1 compound, 2 vehicles and no TSGRPID for none of them?
TS domain example data with selected columns TSSEQ TSGRPID TSPARMCD TSPARM TSVAL 1 ??
Hi!
Do you really need to use TSGRPID in this case?
I think that if you listed one compound and two different drug vehicles, then it's quite straight forward what actual study treatments are.
Regards,
Sergiy
I was just looking at the previous example: 2 compounds - each with its vehicle, linked via TSGRPID, and I was wondering if we can do something similar in my otrher case.
So... not sure if I really need TSGRPID here :)
I could ignore it also for the previous example (2 compounds - each with its vehicle); what do you think?
Same observation for the expected Trial Sets parameters: ARMCD, SPGRPCD, GRPLBL, TRTDOS, TRTDOSU.
These should also be populated in tx.xpt and the Validator should be enhanced to perform these checks.
Yes, definitely it should be a check similar to TS expected parameters.
Thank you for reminder!
Sergiy
Hello,
SEND specs:
There are a lot of parameters with "Should Include"="Yes" (AGEU, ROUTE, etc), but the validator does not seem to report warning / error when one of these parameters is missing from TS.xpt...
Is this a validation that will be implemented in the future?
Or the recommendation from SEND specs can be ignored?