Findings About Observation Class

Hi,

The define-XML specification version 2.0 states:

Note that the SDTM-MSG indicates that the datasets should be displayed in the following Class order:
* TRIAL DESIGN
* SPECIAL PURPOSE - Subject-Level
* INTERVENTIONS
* EVENTS
* FINDINGS
* FINDINGS ABOUT – not yet added to the NCI/CDISC Controlled Terminology as of the time of writing this document
* RELATIONSHIP

The latest CT still does not have "FINDINGS ABOUT" as an observation class, so stating def:Class="FINDINGS ABOUT" raises a validation message. What policy should be followed in this case:

1) Accept the message, and explain it by referring to the define-XML specification

2) Report FA with def:Class="FINDINGS", but in this case the rule for alphabetical order of findings domains does not place it at the end.

Thanks,
-- Thierry