SD1079 for EC

Hi Brian,  The information

Hi Brian, 

The information you provided is not enough for diagnostics of issue. One possible reason could be that your data have VISIT variable which is after ECSTDTC, ECENDTC variables.

The SD1079 check message says that reported variables were placed ahead of some other variables in standard structure. You need to look at your dataset for all details.

Kind Regards, 

Sergiy

Hi, Thanks for the response.

Hi,

Thanks for the response.  What I meant to convey was that I thought the rule could be generating a false positive in the case of EC.  When researching the issue, I began wondering if OpenCDISC uses the OrderNumber attribute to check variable order.  If so, numbers 1, 2, and 3 are duplicated below, which could affect ECSTDTC / ECENDTC.

ItemRef ItemOID="EC.ECDTC" OrderNumber="1" Mandatory="No" Role="Timing" val:Core="Model Permissible"/>

                <ItemRef ItemOID="EC.STUDYID" OrderNumber="1" Mandatory="Yes" Role="Identifier" val:Core="Required"/>

                <ItemRef ItemOID="EC.ECSTDTC" OrderNumber="2" Mandatory="No" Role="Timing" val:Core="Expected"/>

                <ItemRef ItemOID="EC.DOMAIN" OrderNumber="2" Mandatory="Yes" Role="Identifier" val:Core="Required"/>

                <ItemRef ItemOID="EC.USUBJID" OrderNumber="3" Mandatory="No" Role="Identifier" val:Core="Expected"/>

                <ItemRef ItemOID="EC.ECENDTC" OrderNumber="3" Mandatory="No" Role="Timing" val:Core="Expected"/>

                <ItemRef ItemOID="EC.ECRFTDTC" OrderNumber="4" Mandatory="No" Role="Timing" val:Core="Permissible"/>

                <ItemRef ItemOID="EC.POOLID" OrderNumber="4" Mandatory="No" Role="Identifier" val:Core="Model Permissible"/>

 

Thanks-
Brian

Hi Brian,  I see now. In v1.5

Hi Brian, 

I see now. In v1.5 "SDTM 3.2" config has incorrect variable order numbers in CE domain.

It was fixed just after v1.5 release. v2.0 config file have correct metadata for CE domain. Please watch for its release tomorrow morning.

Thank you,

Sergiy 

Great thanks!

Great thanks!