Forums: Troubleshooting and Problems
Hi Damon,
Sorry, I could not find anything wrong with recent CDISC Terminology files. Your example about PK Unit "min*mmol/..." also looks fine. There is no carriage returns in .txt or .xls files I could identify. More details (e.g., exact CT version, file, codelist and term) will be helpful.
Currently Codelists Names are used only in business rule descriptions, while Codelist Code is utilized in validation algorithms. Therefore we do not expect any impact by new changes in CT Codelist Names.
MedDRA validation is independent from CDISC CT.
We'll be happy to investigate any particular examples with false-positive validation messages, which could be related to inconsistencies between CT versions.
Thank you for sharing your findings and concerns!
Kind Regards,
Sergiy
Actually, I found linefeed character for the codelist code Damon pointed out (i.e., C111264).
Filename: SDTM Terminology 2013-12-20.txt
Lines: 5961-2
Column: Submission Value
Other instances are:
NCI EVS code: C112326
Lines: 2438-9
Column: CDSIC Synonym(s)
NCI EVS code: C112395
Lines: 2639-40
Column: CDSIC Synonym(s)
NCI EVS code: C112326
Lines: 3490-1
Column: CDSIC Synonym(s)
NCI EVS code: C112395
Lines: 3694-5
Column: CDSIC Synonym(s)
NCI EVS code: C112267
Lines: 4467-8
Column: CDSIC Synonym(s)
Same issue can be found in the QS Terminology's and SEND Terminology's flat file.
This issue does not exist in any of the flat files for 2014-03-28 release.