Validation Rule Suggestions

Description

This is where folks can suggest additional rules for the Pinnacle 21 Validator.

February 18, 2019

ADaMiG (v1.0 and 1.1) is strictly in favour of restricting the allowed scenarios for creating new variables. While the various fragments - prefixed radicals (e.g. 'WA' used for references to wash-out) and suffixes *FL, *DT etc - suggest this should probably not even be a warning, it would be great of p21 could identify all variables not in ADSL and not named in one of ADaMiG, OCCDS or TTE.

Read More
October 5, 2018

As per FDA study technical conformance guide:

3.3.3 Dataset Column Length

The allotted length for each column containing character (text) data should be set to the maximum length of the variable used across all datasets in the study except for suppqual datasets. For suppqual datasets, the allotted length for each column containing character (text) data should be set to the maximum length of the variable used in the individual dataset.

Read More
June 23, 2018

Hi P21 Team,

May I know, if the validation rules have been updated for EC-EX Domain Derivation.
Or by when would these rules be available in the Enterprise Version at least.

 

Read More
June 30, 2017

This suggestion is a change to the following rule in the SEND 3.0 (FDA).xml rule set:

Read More
June 30, 2017

The validation rule as implemented in Pinnacle 21 is incomplete for the MI domain. It doesn’t appear to include “per Finding Result” in its validation test. These domains should have a single record with the same USUBJID, --SPEC, and --ORRES.

Read More
February 26, 2017

 

 

 

 

Read More
January 10, 2017

Currently, Pinnacle only checks for non-ASCII data in VLM fields (e.g –TEST, --TESTCD, --PARM, --PARMCD, QLABEL, QNAM). What is your opinion about extending the rule to check ALL data fields for non-ascii characters? Can this be implemented in community version?

Read More
April 28, 2016

Hey guys,

The Rules repository is down just when I was upadting the documentation to one of my tools.

I wanted to make the link between each of my checks and the OpenCDISC checks... Timing is a b****, :-).

When is this expected to be up again?

Best wishes,

Dirk

Read More
January 12, 2016

Pinnacle Community combines FDA rules FDAN014 and FDAN015, and assigns the lower severity of warning, where rule FDAN014 is listed as an ERROR by the FDA for the domains of TS, TX, and DM.

Pinnacle Community combines FDA rules FDAN018 and FDAN019, and assigns the lower severity of warning, where rule FDAN019 is listed as an ERROR by the FDA for the TS domain.

Pinnacle Community calls FDAN031 a Notice; the FDA rule set classifies it as a Warning.

Pinnacle Community calls FDAN055 a Notice; the FDA rule set classifies it as a Warning.

Read More
December 22, 2015

The tool warns about imputed values for these two variables.  When POOLID is used instead of USUBJID for FW records (which is very common), the tool doesn't find the RFSTDTC and thinks the value is, therefore, imputed. 

Read More
Subscribe to Validation Rule Suggestions

Want a demo?

Let’s Talk.

We're eager to share and ready to listen.

Cookie Policy

Pinnacle 21 uses cookies to make our site easier for you to use. By continuing to use this website, you agree to our use of cookies. For more info visit our Privacy Policy.