This question has not so much to do with Pinnacle21 validation. The better forum for this is the "LinkedIn SDTM Experts forum" with >3000 participants and all the SDTM gurus being very actively there in responding to questions: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/2758697/
Also, if you think your approach is a good one, don't start changing it or any data just because of validation errors. Be however sure you document everything in the define.xml (the "sponsor's truth") and in the reviewers guide.
I am working with a protocol that includes survival follow-up conducted via phone calls or review of medical records. We are struggling with how to approach the survival follow-up reviews which identified the subject to be deceased. At the moment we have:
This scenario is very common in oncology studies, so I'm thinking these questions were answered somewhere long long ago, but I can't find anything definitive.