SD9999 and Associated Persons (AP)

Hi,  It's correct. P21…

Hi, 

It's correct. P21 Community 2.2.0 is quite outdated version. Please wait for the next release or consider Enterprise.

Regards, 

Sergiy 

Associated Person Validation (Update)

Hi Sergyi,

any update on this? I can see AP are not yet supported by both Community (v3.0.0) and Enterprise.

Also the "SDTM Conformance Rules v1" (SDTMIG v3.2) released  on Conformance Rules v1.0 27Jan2017 has some specific checks for AP that are not implemented in any of the P21 version, for example CG01550-CG0162 and CG0366 and CG0367, any reason?

Essentialy all AP datasets, inclusing SQAP--, could be not validated with P21.

Thanks, Angelo

Sergiy

on May 14, 2019

P21

They will be re-introduced soon

Hi Angelo,

Actually, we implemented them. However, last minute before the release we found some related issue to be fixed and removed all AP rules.They will be re-introduced soon.

Kind Regards, 

Sergiy 

Thanks

Thanks Sergiy

Could you please let us know…

Could you please let us know when are you planning to re-introduce AP implementation? Otherwise, how should we explain the error message regarding to associated person domain?

Thanks.

Best Regards,

Nien-Yin

Is there any update in AP domains class?

hi,

I am using pinnacle 21 community 3.1.2 version and still getting the same message 'SD9999'.

Thanks,

Rajeshkanna

Is there any update in AP domains class?

I am using pinnacle 21 community 4.1.0 version and still getting the same message 'SD9999'.

Thanks!

Matt

on August 12, 2024

P21

Hello Xin,   An engine…

Hello Xin,

An engine update is needed to fully support the AP domains to account for any type of AP domain that is being used. Our teams are actively working on providing this support in a future engine release.

If SD9999 reports an issue when submitting a datasets mapped to the AP domain, it’s recommended to simply ensure that the dataset follows the AP structure and provide an explanation in the cSDRG for this rule.

Kind regards,

Matt