We recently discovered this issue on OpenCDISCv1.3:
Our study has 4 split QS domains (e.g. QSAA, QSBB, QSCC and QSDD). Out of these four split domains, QSCC had no observations. All four domains were included in the OpenCDISC Validator run and the tool only reviewed domains QSAA and QSBB. It did not process QSCC and QSDD. We understand that QSCC was not processed as it was an empty domain, however we didn't realize that the tool would overlook/exclude the next valid QSxx domain.The tool reviewed QSAA, QSBB and QSDD after QSCC was removed from the "review list".
Our suggestion: For future updates to the tool, will it be possible to develop an error message to notify the user if an empty domain (split or otherwise) is inadvertently included for review?
Please let us know if you have any other recommendations,
P.S: The team has been made aware that empty domains should NOT be send for OpenCDISC Validator review,
Pinnacle 21 uses cookies to make our site easier for you to use. By continuing to use this website, you agree to our use of cookies. For more info visit our Privacy Policy.
Hi Team,
We recently discovered this issue on OpenCDISCv1.3:
Our study has 4 split QS domains (e.g. QSAA, QSBB, QSCC and QSDD). Out of these four split domains, QSCC had no observations. All four domains were included in the OpenCDISC Validator run and the tool only reviewed domains QSAA and QSBB. It did not process QSCC and QSDD. We understand that QSCC was not processed as it was an empty domain, however we didn't realize that the tool would overlook/exclude the next valid QSxx domain.The tool reviewed QSAA, QSBB and QSDD after QSCC was removed from the "review list".
Our suggestion: For future updates to the tool, will it be possible to develop an error message to notify the user if an empty domain (split or otherwise) is inadvertently included for review?
Please let us know if you have any other recommendations,
P.S: The team has been made aware that empty domains should NOT be send for OpenCDISC Validator review,
Regards,
Jhelum Naik