After a submission, we were informed that we needed to rederive a variable in ADSL that is used in a limited number of outputs. Since this is a huge deliverable, it was decided to create a 2nd ADSL dataset to use only for the relevant outputs (rather than rerunning/re-QCing everything). Since all the other ADaMs contain all of the ADSL variables, this will cause a mismatch for this variable between the new ADSL and the other datasets.
I'm not sure if this is something that P21 crosschecks (the value of a variable across multiple datasets). Are we OK renaming the new ADSL and submitting it with the other ADaMs as-is?
Pinnacle 21 uses cookies to make our site easier for you to use. By continuing to use this website, you agree to our use of cookies. For more info visit our Privacy Policy.
After a submission, we were informed that we needed to rederive a variable in ADSL that is used in a limited number of outputs. Since this is a huge deliverable, it was decided to create a 2nd ADSL dataset to use only for the relevant outputs (rather than rerunning/re-QCing everything). Since all the other ADaMs contain all of the ADSL variables, this will cause a mismatch for this variable between the new ADSL and the other datasets.
I'm not sure if this is something that P21 crosschecks (the value of a variable across multiple datasets). Are we OK renaming the new ADSL and submitting it with the other ADaMs as-is?