Forums: Define.xml
Thanks for the answer,
I guess we are speacking here of two different thing. It is clear that value-level-metadata was always part of the define.xml.
My problem is, that in earlier CDISC documents the analysis-value-metadata.xls and analysis-variable-metadata.xls were described as two different files. Based on them it was ok to generate a define.xml. Now the actual CDISC Model Guideline, version 2.1, describes only one document analysis-variable-metadata which includes the analysis-value-metadata. Currently we do not have any ideas how based on this one document the define.xml should work. We had a look at the pilot project as well and did not find the description of the files which were the basis for the define.xml. It looks like two documents: value-metadata and variable-metadata were used, but we could not find where it is exactly stated.
Thanks,
Natalie
HI together,
my question is not really related to OpenCDISC validator, but maybe someone could answer it anyway. How do you interpret the ADaM Model Guideline 2.1. According to my understanding, the analysis-value-metadata which was previously a separate file has now to be integrated into the analysis-variable-metadata. This is no problem, the question is how can a define.xml be generated based on this new analysis-variable-metadata? How do you generate th define.xml for adams. Do you have different files as basis or only one?
Thanks for help,
Natalie